Unknown

(PC) Castro v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20242:23-cv-01463California410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE CASTRO, No. 2:23-cv-01463-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 29, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 12. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.