Borquez

(PC) Harris v. Borquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20241:23-cv-00046California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00046-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE BORQUEZ, et al., (ECF No. 35) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Borquez and Quevedo1 for deliberate fabrication of evidence in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. On December 6, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (ECF No. 35.) Together with the motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.