Newsom

(PC) Thomas v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20241:23-cv-00622California4,357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRENTICE RAY THOMAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00622-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION NEWSOM, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE (ECF Nos. 7, 9, 11) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 I. Background Plaintiff Prentice Ray Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a county jail inmate and former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 13, 2023, the Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 7.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.