(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20242:24-cv-00014California1,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:24-cv-0014 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARNER BROTHERS, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and appointment of counsel. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. “A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.” Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Tr., 821 F.2d 1368, 1370 (9th Cir. 1987). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds this action to be frivolous and will recommend that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.