(PC) Hill v. Escobar et.al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20242:21-cv-02118California932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, Case No. 2:21-cv-02118-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

ESCOBAR, et al., EFFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 Plaintiff, a civil detainee, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Despite multiple opportunities to do so, plaintiff has not provided the U.S. Marshal with sufficient information to effect service on defendants Rios and Bonache. Thus, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), I will recommend that this action be dismissed. On November 14, 2022, I directed service on defendants Rios and Bonache under the court’s E-Service pilot program. ECF No. 16. Process was returned unserved because CDCR could not identify either defendant. ECF No. 18. I directed plaintiff to provide additional information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.