Peete
(PC) Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento v. Peete
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN JAMAN PEETE, Case No. 2:23-cv-01619-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO
STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM AND
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., BE DISMISSED 15 Defendants. ECF No. 9
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 18 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison, brings this § 1983 action against the Sacramento County Superior Court and, as best I can tell, alleges that they have mishandled his filings and issued incorrect rulings against him. ECF No. 9 at 8-9. These allegations do not state a claim upon which relief may be granted and should be dismissed without leave to amend. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity,…