Rucker

(PS) Tafari v. Rucker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20242:22-cv-01666California1,084 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI, Case No. 2:22-cv-01666-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, ECF No. 6 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff brings this action against Federal Express Corporation, alleging that this defendant violated his rights under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by forcing him to provide a social security number in order to secure employment—a policy to which he objects on the basis of his religious beliefs. ECF No. 6 at 16-18. This allegation fails to state a claim, and I recommend that the complaint be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.