Unknown

(HC) Grayson v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20242:23-cv-02861California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIQUAN S. GRAYSON, No. 2:23-CV-2861-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a “certification from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the institution” as required by Rule 3(a)(2) of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certification, or pay the appropriate filing fee. As to the certification requirement, while a copy of Petitioner’s prison trust account statement certified by prison officials is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.