Stashyn

(PC) Stanford v. Stashyn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20242:23-cv-02125California1,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRELL CORDARRYL STANFORD, Case No. 2:23-cv-02125-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DONNA STASHYN, et al., DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

Defendants. JUDGE TO THIS MATTER ECF No. 2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM

20 ECF No. 8

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 23 Plaintiff Terrell Cordarryl Stanford, a state inmate, alleges in his amended complaint that defendants Judge Donna Stashyn, defense attorney Peter Firpo, and deputy district attorney Melissa Marshall violated his constitutional rights. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has failed to cure the deficiencies noted in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.