Mroczek

(PS) Espinoza v. Mroczek

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20242:23-cv-00228California3,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAMON L. ESPINOZA, Case No. 2:23-cv-00228-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

STRIKE

RICK MROCZECK, et al., ECF No. 11 Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS BE GRANTED AND THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND ECF No. 13 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

21 In this wrongful foreclosure action, defendants Rick Mroczek; ZBS Law, LLP; and LoanCare, LLC, move to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 13. Defendant Geoffrey Neal joins the other defendants’ motion. ECF No. 18. Because plaintiff fails to state any plausible 26 27 1 Defendant ZBS Law, LLP, was erroneously sued as ZBS Law LLP. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.