Chicago's Pizza Inc. v. KSM Pizza, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20242:19-cv-02373California5,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHICAGO’S PIZZA INC., No. 2:19-cv-02373-DJC-CKD Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v.

KSM PIZZA, INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Chicago’s Pizza (“CPI” or “plaintiff”) seeks default judgment for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition against defendant, KSM Pizza (“defendant”). (See ECF No. 68.) Plaintiff also seek a permanent injunction, and plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $139,859.29. (Id.) The undersigned took plaintiff’s motion under submission without oral argument in accordance with Eastern District Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 71.) Defendant has not filed an opposition to the motion for default judgment in accordance with Local Rule 230(c). The undersigned issues the following findings and recommendations upon review of the documents in support of this motion and good cause appearing. ///// 28 I. Background A. Underlying Facts Plaintiff operates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.