Burke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT TREVINO, Case No. 2:21-cv-01415-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL IN PART

G. BURKE, et al., ECF No. 55 Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO AMEND

COMPLAINT BE DENIED

ECF Nos. 52 & 57 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

20 Pending are plaintiff’s motion to compel, ECF No. 55, and two motions to amend the complaint, ECF Nos. 52 & 57. For the reasons stated below, I will grant the motion to compel in part and recommend that the motions to amend be denied. I. Motion to Compel In a disorganized and difficult-to-understand motion, plaintiff appears to attack the sufficiency of several discovery responses that defendants have provided to his interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admission. …