(PC) Boland v. Second Watch Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20241:23-cv-01019California1,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL BOLAND, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01019-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

SECOND WATCH OFFICER, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 Plaintiff Daniel Boland is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his complaint on July 7, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On October 27, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 11.) The Court found Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Id. at 3-7.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, or, alternatively, a notice of voluntary dismissal, within 21 days of the date of service of the order. (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.