Estate of Sherrano Stingley v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20242:23-cv-00255California1,371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF SHERRANO STINGLEY, No. 2:23-cv-00255 TLN AC DYMIN STINGLEY, S.S., and ANNETTE HILBURN, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 This matter is before the court on a motion to enforce or amend/modify the stipulated protective order (ECF No. 18) that was approved by the undersigned on August 17, 2023. ECF No. 19. This discovery motion was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). The matter was taken under submission on the papers. ECF No. 36. The parties submitted the required joint statement. ECF No. 50. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS the motion. I. Relevant Background This case arises from the death of Sherrano Stingley, a 48-year-old disabled Black man who struggled with mental health issues and periodically experienced mental health episodes. ECF No. 1 at 4. According to the complaint, Mr. Stingley was experiencing mental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.