Bowman

(PS) Roberts v. Bowman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20242:22-cv-01694California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01694-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

VIDEO CONFERENCE AS UNNECESSARY

BRIAN BOWMAN, et al., ECF No. 9 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

18 ECF No. 7

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 21 Plaintiff brings this action against several defendants, including two members of the Scripps San Diego emergency room medical staff, a medical board enforcement analyst, and a manager of “Studio 15 Lock and Keys.” ECF No. 7 at 4-5. The operative, second amended complaint is incomprehensible and fails to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. Plaintiff has

1 Plaintiff has also filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 6, but her subsequent complaint supersedes it. Out of an abundance of caution, I have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.