Moreno

(PC) Richson-Bey v. Moreno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20241:21-cv-01294California214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SEAN JEFFREY RICHSON-BEY, No. 1:21-cv-01294-NODJ-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO

v. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL

R. MORENO, et al., (ECF No. 47) Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 15 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice to voluntary dismiss the action pursuant to || Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (ECF No. 47.) On January 17, 2024, Defendants filed a 18 statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 49.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 19 been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th 20 Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 22 || and adjust the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.