Allison

(PC) Rouser v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20242:21-cv-02206California747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ROUSER, No. 2:21-cv-02206-DAD-CKD (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. (Doc. No. 23) 16 Plaintiff William Rouser is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 14, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without leave to amend, due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 23.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.