(PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HESSE, No. 2:21-cv-1931 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, proceeding in forma pauperis. At the time the pending motions for summary judgment were filed, plaintiff was represented by counsel. Since then, counsel was granted leave to withdraw. Because plaintiff was previously represented by counsel, plaintiff has not received notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988). Therefore, plaintiff is provided such notice by this order, and grants plaintiff an extension of time to comply with the December 29, 2023 order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, motions concerning discovery, motions…