Haddad

(PC) Casey v. Haddad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20241:21-cv-00855California400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-NODJ-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

HADDAD, et al., (ECF No. 28)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 12, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending (1) that this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Castillo, Castro and Fernandez, and failure to intervene claims against Defendants Agatar and Haddad; (2) that Defendant John Doe be dismissed from the action; and (3) that any remaining claims in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.