(PC) Edwards v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20241:23-cv-01180California411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KADEEM EDWARDS, 1:23-cv-01180-NODJ-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (ECF No. 13) REHABILITATION,

Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 4, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Jane Doe L.V.N., the remaining claims to be dismissed, and that Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and John Does 1 through 10 be dismissed from the action. (ECF No. 13.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.