Epperson

Epperson v. United States Congress

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20241:23-cv-01687California2,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, No. 1:23-cv-01687-NODJ-SKO

Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: UNITED STATES CONGRESS, THE (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

REPUBLICAN PARTY, HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES, BILL CLINTON, (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE

BARACK OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP, WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

GEORGE BUSH, COMPLAINT; OR

(3) FILE A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY Defendants. DISMISSAL 18 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 22 Plaintiff Chris J. Epperson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on December 5, 2023. (Doc. 1.) Upon reviewing the complaint, the Court concludes that it fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. He may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.