Dunn

Dunn v. HUD / Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20241:23-cv-01565California2,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ALANA DUNN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01565-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM HUD/URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., (Docs. 5 & 6) Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 14 15 Plaintiff Alana Dunn, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, filed a civil complaint on November 6, 2023. (Doc. 1). On November 28, 2023, the undersigned screened the complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days leave to file an amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order. (Doc. 5.) On December 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which is before the Court for screening. (Doc. 6.) After screening Plaintiff’s amended complaint, the Court finds that despite the explicit recitation of the deficiencies of the original complaint, Plaintiff has failed to plead any cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.