Kumar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NALINI KUMAR and ALLEN SINGH, No. 2:23-cv-02312 DAD AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1-10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on two separate discovery motions. First, plaintiffs move to compel defendant to produce (1) documents in response to a request for production and (2) a company witness to testify about its financial condition in response to a Rule 30(b)(6) subpoena. ECF No. 84 (joint statement at ECF No. 91). Second, the defendant moves to compel compliance with a third-party subpoena. ECF No. 93 (opposition at ECF No. 95, reply at ECF No. 96). These discovery motions were referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). Each motion was taken under submission and heard on the papers. ECF Nos. 87, 94. I. Relevant Background Plaintiffs purchased an insurance policy from Nationwide to insure against risk of loss to their dwelling…