Castellanos

Castellanos v. Harder Mechanical Contractors

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20241:23-cv-01639California3,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LUIS A. CASTELLANOS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01639-NODJ-CDB

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER

v. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE LONG FORM APPLICATION TO

HARDER MECHANICAL PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

CONTRACTORS,

(Docs. 1-2) Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE:

FEBRUARY 9, 2024

14 15 This matter is before the court on a screening of Plaintiff Luis A. Castellanos’ (“Plaintiff” or “Castellanos”) Complaint. (Doc. 1). Castellanos, who is proceeding pro se in this matter, did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Harder Mechanical Contractors (“Harder”) unjustly fired him for having cooperated in a complaint process for disability discrimination. The Court has screened the complaint and finds that Plaintiff has not pled sufficient facts to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.