(PC) Blackgold v. Harmon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20241:23-cv-00782California2,969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUTEN BLACKGOLD, No. 1:22-cv-00930 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS STATUS SHOULD NOT BE

REVOKED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

CDCR, et al., 1915(G) Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE

FEBRUARY 20, 2024

17 SUTEN BLACKGOLD, No. 1:23-cv-00782 GSA (PC) 18 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS STATUS SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

HARMON, 1915(G)

21 Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE FEBRUARY 20, 2024 23 24 25 26 A review of court records indicates that Plaintiff also goes by the name “Mitchell Quentin Grady.” See Blackgold v. Madison, 3:23-cv-01740 JLS DDL (S.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.