Vieth

(PC) Moten v. Vieth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20241:24-cv-00068California1,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARROD MOTEN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00068-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

VIETH, et al. (Doc. 2)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 Plaintiff Sharrod Moten (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff filed the instant action on January 16, 2024, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1-2). Discussion The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) was enacted “to curb frivolous prisoner complaints and appeals.” Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1099-1100 (9th Cir. 2011). Pursuant to the PLRA, the in forma pauperis statute was amended to include section 1915(g), a non-merits…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.