(PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20242:23-cv-01522California4,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY STUART HALAJIAN, No. 2:23-cv-1522 DJC DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, et al., Defendants, 16 Plaintiff Barry Stuart Halajian is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply, and plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order. (ECF Nos. 7, 22, 24, 28.) For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions to dismiss will be granted, plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint, and plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order will be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on July 25, 2023, by filing a 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.