(PC) Stewart v. De La Cruz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20241:20-cv-00978California991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERICK LATON STEWART, SR., Case No. 1:20-cv-00978-JLT-HBK(PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (Doc. No. 29) A. DE LA CRUZ and J, MIRAMONTES, Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel filed December 29, 2023. (Doc. No. 29). Plaintiff, a prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his civil rights complaint alleging an Eight Amendment excessive use of force claim against Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 1, 4). Plaintiff seeks appointment counsel because he “is a greenhorn at law” and has been diagnosed by correctional officials “as an inmate requiring a level of mental health care that necessitates prison officials to communicate with Plaintiff in a slowly spoken mode to assure that Plaintiff understands what is being conveyed to him.” (Doc. No. 29 at 2). Additionally, Plaintiff has had the assistance of other inmates to help him with this litigation, but 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.