McKenzie
McKenzie v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAMINA MCKENZIE, et al. Case No. 1:23-cv-01620-CDB
Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT WITH
13 v. PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION. (Doc. 1)
Defendant.
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
17 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 18 Plaintiffs Adamina McKenzie and Elliot McKenzie (hereinafter collectively “Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action against Defendant the Social Security Administration. (Docs. 1, 4). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, federal courts must screen IFP complaints and dismiss the case if the action is “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (“[S]ection 1915(e) not…