(PC) Edwards v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20241:23-cv-01180California1,156 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KADEEM EDWARDS, 1:23-cv-01180-NODJ-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NINETY

v. DAYS TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE L.V.N.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his complaint on August 9, 2023. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff named the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jane Doe, L.V.N., and John Does 1 through 10 as defendants. (Id.) In its First Screening Order issued November 6, 2023, the Court found Plaintiff had stated a cognizable claim for a deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Jane Doe, L.V.N. (Doc. 10 at 4-7.) Additionally, the Court found Plaintiff had not stated a cognizable claim against any other named defendant. (Id.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.