Pfeiffer

(HC) Vera v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20241:23-cv-00884California530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

G. MEMO VERA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00884-NODJ-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS

v. (ECF Nos. 6, 15) CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent. 16 On June 9, 2023, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his ongoing Kern County Superior Court criminal proceedings. (ECF No. 1.) On October 3, 2023, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 9.) On January 18, 2024,1 the Court issued findings and recommendation recommending that the motion to dismiss be granted and the petition be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. (ECF No. 17.) On July 17, 2023, Petitioner filed a motion for sanctions, citing to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 6.) In the motion, Petitioner complains of being referred to a psychologist in his state criminal proceedings who allegedly previously fabricated a finding of incompetence. Petitioner alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.