(PC)Roberson
(PC)Roberson v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORRIS ROBERSON, No. 1:22-cv-00833 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING
v. DEFENDANTS’ EXHAUSTION MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CDCR, et al., (Docs. 29, 39) Defendants. 16 Morris Roberson seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants assert Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies for his claim for failure to intervene and seek summary adjudication on the claim. (Doc. 29.) The magistrate judge found Defendants “carried their burden to show that there was an available administrative remedy and that Plaintiff did not exhaust that available remedy prior to commencement of the instant lawsuit.” (Doc. 39 at 14.) The magistrate judge determined the evidence—including other submitted and exhausted grievances—showed that “Plaintiff simply failed to assert all of the factual…