Kitt

(PC) Ramirez v. Kitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20241:17-cv-00947California3,212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:17-cv-00947-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RULING ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL

v. (ECF No. 52)

KITT, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. MOTIONS TO COMPEL (ECF Nos. 44, 47) 16 Defendant’s Supplemental Responses Due: February 21, 2024 Plaintiff’s Supplemental Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment Due: March 21, 2024 20 I. Procedural History Plaintiff Armando Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Kitt (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.