Palomares

Palomares v. City of Arvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20241:21-cv-01745California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL PALOMARES, by and Case No. 1:21-cv-01745-JLT-CDB through his Guardian Ad Litem VIOLETA NEGRETE GARCIA, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

Plaintiff, IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

v. (Doc. 50)

CITY OF ARVIN, et al.

TWO-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 17 On December 21, 2023, the assigned district judge adopted in full the undersigned’s Findings and Recommendations to approve Plaintiff’s petition for approval of an incompetent person’s claims. (Docs. 49, 50). In the Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, the assigned district judge ordered the parties to “file a stipulation for dismissal of the action with prejudice, and lodge a separate order, no later than 30 days after issuance of this order.” (Doc. 50 at 2). As of the date of this order, more than 30 days have passed and the parties have not complied with the Court’s order to file a stipulation for dismissal. Local Rule 110…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.