Doe

Doe v. Northern CA Fertility Medical Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20242:22-cv-01861California5,586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and all No. 22-cv-01861-DAD-JDP others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FERTILITY

MEDICAL CENTER, (Doc. No. 23) Defendant. 17 This matter is before the court on the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Northern California Fertility Medical Center on January 1, 2023. (Doc No. 23.) On March 22, 2023, the pending motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 32.) For the reasons explained below, defendant’s motion to dismiss will be denied. BACKGROUND On December 19, 2022, plaintiff Jane Doe filed her operative first amended complaint (“FAC”), alleging that defendant failed to safeguard her sensitive medical information from cybercriminals. (Doc. No. 16.) In her FAC, plaintiff alleges the following.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.