Gemo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEVON SANFORD, Jr., Case No. 2:21-cv-00824-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

G. GEMO, et al., ECF No. 36 Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 Plaintiff alleges that defendants Gemo and Williams, both officers at the California Medical Facility, violated his Eighth Amendment rights. ECF No. 1 at 3-4. He alleges that Gemo ignored his pleas for medical assistance after an injured ankle caused him to fall in his cell. Id. at 3. Afterwards, Gemo deemed plaintiff a “disruptive inmate” and summoned additional officers. Id. Williams was among the responding officers and allegedly used excessive force to restrain plaintiff by putting pressure on the injured ankle. Id. at 4. Defendants now move for summary judgment and argue that they did not violate plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights and, 25 …