Babcock

(PC) Anderson v. Babcock

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20242:23-cv-02779California273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE ANDERSON, No. 2:23-cv-2779-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C.BABCOCK, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed December 13, 2023, plaintiff was required to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.