(HC) Brown v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20242:23-cv-01835California733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BROWN, No. 2:23-CV-1835-DMC-P Petitioner, v. ORDER PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time. See ECF No. 1. Petitioner initiated this action by way of the pending motion for an extension of time to file a petition. No petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been filed. Petitioner states in his motion for an extension of time that he is concerned about expiration of the one-year statute of limitations and seeks an order extending the time to file a habeas petition. In effect, Petitioner seeks an advisory opinion regarding whether his federal petition will be time-barred if a petition is filed at some unspecified date in the future, which may or may not be within the limitations period, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.