(PS) Vicari v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20242:21-cv-02117California421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD ANGELO VICARI, No. 2:21-cv-02117 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF AMADOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 30, 2023, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 10. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff was required to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition within 21 days of the motion being filed. In this case, the deadline was September 20, 2023. Plaintiff did not file an opposition or statement of non-opposition. Concerned that plaintiff had abandoned this case, on October 12, 2023 the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 35. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure respond could lead to a recommendation that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.