Perez

Perez v. Foster Poultry Farms

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20241:22-cv-00691California5,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 RICARDO PEREZ, Case: 1:22-CV-691-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

v. (Doc. 6) FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, et al,

Defendants.

17 18 I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Ricardo Perez’s motion to remand. (Doc. 6.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1441(a), Foster Poultry Farms removed Plaintiff’s disparate treatment, discrimination, and wrongful termination suit from state court to this Court on the grounds of federal question jurisdiction, arguing § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (Section 301), 28 U.S.C. § 185, preempts Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 1.) For reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion and remands this case to the Merced County Superior Court. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s Complaint asserted twelve causes of action: (1) discrimination in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940, (2) hostile work 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.