Marsh

Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20241:23-cv-01451California2,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01451-JLT-EPG Plaintiffs, SCREENING ORDER ALLOWING

PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT TO PROCEED ON FCRA

CLAIM

FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, (ECF No. 9) Defendant.

17 18 Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 7, 9). On November 27, 2023, the Court screened, but found no cognizable claims in, Plaintiff’s initial complaint, which generally alleged that Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by providing false information to consumer reporting agencies. (ECF No. 8). The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend, and they timely filed a first amended complaint, which is now before the Court for screening. (ECF Nos. 8, 9). Upon review, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs have stated a claim under the FCRA. Accordingly, the Court will allow Plaintiffs to proceed on their FCRA claim in their first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.