(SS) Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20241:21-cv-00710California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUPE ELIZABETH ANDERSON, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00710 JLT HBK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MARTIN O’MALLEY, ) CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY Commissioner of Social Security, ) JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING CASE TO ) COMMISSIONER Defendant. ) ) (Docs. 1, 20, 23, 26) 16 Lupe Elizabeth Anderson initiated this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 1, 20.) The assigned magistrate judge found “the ALJ did not provide clear and convincing reasons, supported by substantial evidence, for rejecting Plaintiff’s symptom claims.” (Doc. 26 at 10; see also id. at 6-10.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted, Defendant’s construed cross-motion for summary judgment be denied, and the decision be remanded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.