Pfieffer

(PC) Aytman v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20241:23-cv-00382California613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TORIAN AYTMAN, No. 1:23-cv-00382 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, Appeal No. 24-247 v. ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATUS ON APPEAL

PFIEFFER, et al., (Doc. 22) Defendants. 16 Torian Aytman is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court dismissed the action for failure to state and entered judgment. (Docs. 17, 18.) On January 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a letter to the Court, (Doc. 19), which was processed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as Case No. 24-247, (Docs. 20, 21). The Ninth Circuit referred this matter to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.