(HC)Foreman

(HC)Foreman v. Allen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20241:23-cv-00390California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRENTICE FOREMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00390 JLT EPG (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DENYING PETITIONER’S

TRENT ALLEN, REQUEST FOR STAY, DIRECTING CLERK

OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE, AND

Respondent. DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

16 (Docs. 1, 23, 24) 17 Prentice Foreman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge found that Petitioner did not raise a colorable cumulative error claim and his request for stay was not warranted. (Doc. 24 at 48-49.) Accordingly, the magistrate judge recommended the petition for habeas corpus and Petitioner’s request for a stay be denied. (Id. at 49.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any objections were due within 30…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.