(PC) Rajagopal v. Modesto Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20242:23-cv-02967California433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GOPI RAJAGOPAL, No. 2:23-cv-2967 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff requests an extension because he is in restricted housing as a pretrial detainee. He states that he “may not be able to mail the court to process the application.” (Id.) He further states that he is “asking the Court to consider an injective [sic] order to stop the criminal proceeding by the Superior Court” in case number CR-22-011456. (Id.) The court notes that the instant filing indicates that plaintiff is permitted to send mail while in restricted housing. However, out of an abundance of caution, the undersigned will grant plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.