Schmidt

Schmidt v. Vision Service Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20242:20-cv-02400California8,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SCHMIDT, on behalf of No. 2:20-cv-2400-KJN himself and the Class and Collective members, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, et al., Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Michael Schmidt moves for preliminary approval of settlement of his Rule 23 class, Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective, and Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims. (ECF No. 57). Defendants Vision Service Plan (VSP), VSP Global, Inc., Marchon Eyewear, Inc., VSP Optical Group, Inc., and Eyefinity, Inc. do not oppose the motion. //// //// //// 26 27 1 On consent of the parties, this case was referred to the undersigned by District Judge Drozd. (ECF No. 52.) The parties appeared for a hearing on the instant motion on January 16, 2024. (ECF No. 57.) Attorneys David Leimbach and Scott Gordon appeared for plaintiff; attorney Ashley Fasano appeared for defendants. By and through this motion, plaintiff seeks: (1) conditional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.