Ramadan

(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20241:23-cv-01193California1,567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO JESUS PONCE, 1:23-cv-01193-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S

v. FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

RAMADAN, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 10, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On November 13, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 9.) The Court found Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Id. at 3-6.) Plaintiff was ordered to file either a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order, or a notice of voluntary dismissal, within 21 days of the date of service of the order. (Id. at 6-7.) On November 21, 2023, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.