Ramadan

(PC) Sherman v. Ramadan

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20241:20-cv-01609California1,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SHERMAN, No. 1:20-cv-1609 JLT GSA Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

RAMADAN, THIS MATTER AND DENIAL OF MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT

Defendant. (ECF No. 28)

OBJECTIONS TO ORDER DUE FEBRUARY

9, 2024 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and his notice regarding Plaintiff’s failure to oppose it. ECF Nos. 28, 35, respectively. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. In addition, it will be recommended that Defendant’s motion to dismiss be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.