(PS)Curtiss

(PS)Curtiss v. SN Servicing Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20242:23-cv-02455California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CURTISS AND JENNIFER No. 2:23-cv-2455 DB

CURTISS,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. SN SERVICING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, 17 This civil action has been directly assigned to the undersigned pursuant to the Local Rules, Appendix A(m). On November 7, 2023, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiffs failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on December 11, 2023, the undersigned issued plaintiffs an order to show cause and continued the hearing of defendants’ motion to February 2, 2024. (ECF No. 11.) On December 22, 2023, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a response to the order to show cause. (ECF Nos. 12 & 13.) Granting the motion to withdraw would leave plaintiffs proceeding in propria persona. On January 9, 2024, defendants filed an opposition. (ECF No. 14.) The motion to withdraw filed by plaintiffs’ counsel is defective in several respects. First,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.