Knight

(PC) Martin v. Knight

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20241:22-cv-01582California1,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OMAR MARTIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01582-NODJ-BAM (PC)

Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER –

NOTICE AND WARNING OF

v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KNIGHT, et al., MOTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 40)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Omar Martin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Knight for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. Rand Notice Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on January 26, 2024. (ECF No. 40.) Upon review of the motion, the Court finds that although a Rand warning was filed, the warning incorrectly refers to the Local Rules of the Northern District of California, rather than the Eastern 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.